Economist validates the free content model

Ben Compaine cites an economist's study of the Washington Post that provides "another data point" in the online paid-content discussion:

With 30 pages of assumptions, explanation and calculations, Gentzkow makes a well substantiated finding that, The Washington Post would have been better off charging a modest sum for its online version (on the order of $6.00/month) until about 2004. After that, however, the growth in online advertising expenditures crossed over to affirm that it is significantly more profitable to set a zero price for the online edition when one factors in even a small transaction cost for online payments. He suggests that his findings are robust enough that they would likely apply to other big city newspapers.

Interestingly, the study includes a calculation of the “consumer welfare benefit” of providing free content in the Washington Post's market.

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Note that spam will NOT be published regardless of how you answer. Links in comments are forbidden.
6 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.